↓ Skip to main content

The risk of female malignancies after fertility treatments: a cohort study with 25-year follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 2,632)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
The risk of female malignancies after fertility treatments: a cohort study with 25-year follow-up
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00432-015-2035-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Kessous, E. Davidson, M. Meirovitz, R. Sergienko, E. Sheiner

Abstract

To investigate whether an association exists between a history of fertility treatments and future risk of female malignancies. A population-based study compared the incidence of long-term female malignancies in a cohort of women with and without a history of fertility treatments including in vitro fertilization (IVF) and ovulation induction (OI). Deliveries occurred between the years 1988-2013, with a mean follow-up duration of 12 years. Excluded from the study were women with known genetic predisposition for malignancies or known malignancies prior to the index pregnancy. Female malignancies were divided into specific types including ovarian, uterine, breast and cervix. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to estimate cumulative incidence of malignancies. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for female malignancy. During the study period, 106,031 women met the inclusion criteria; 4.1 % (n = 4363) occurred in patients following fertility treatments. During the follow-up period, patients with a history of IVF treatments had a significantly increased risk of being diagnosed with ovarian and uterine cancer as compared to patients after OI and patients with no history of fertility treatments. Cox proportional hazard models were constructed for ovarian and uterine cancer separately, controlling for confounders such as maternal age and obesity. A history of IVF treatment remained independently associated with ovarian and uterine cancer (adjusted HR 3.9; 95 % CI 1.2-12.6; P = 0.022 and adjusted HR 4.6; 95 % CI 1.4-14.9; P = 0.011; respectively). IVF treatments pose a significant risk of subsequent long-term ovarian and uterine cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 19 27%
Unknown 17 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 21 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#471,782
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#9
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,388
of 268,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.