| Title |
Effectiveness of a nutrition education package in improving feeding practices, dietary adequacy and growth of infants and young children in rural Tanzania: rationale, design and methods of a cluster randomised trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1077 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kissa BM Kulwa, Roosmarijn Verstraeten, Kimberley P Bouckaert, Peter S Mamiro, Patrick W Kolsteren, Carl Lachat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 525 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 519 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 105 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 11% |
| Researcher | 50 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 32 | 6% |
| Other | 88 | 17% |
| Unknown | 147 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 106 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 45 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 6% |
| Psychology | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 61 | 12% |
| Unknown | 169 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,542,747
of 23,674,309 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,856
of 15,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,750
of 257,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#133
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,674,309 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.