↓ Skip to main content

Challenges in minor TBI and indications for head CT in pediatric TBI—an update

Overview of attention for article published in Child's Nervous System, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Challenges in minor TBI and indications for head CT in pediatric TBI—an update
Published in
Child's Nervous System, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00381-017-3535-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Navneet Singh, Ash Singhal

Abstract

Pediatric head trauma is one of the commonest presentations to emergency departments. Over 90% of such head injuries are considered mild, but still present risk acute clinical deterioration and longer term morbidity. Identifying which children are at risk of clinically important brain injuries remains challenging and much of the data on minor head injuries is based on the adult population. Children, however, are different, both anatomically and in terms of mechanism of injury, to adults and, even within the pediatric group, there are differences with age and stage of development. CT scans have added to the repertoire of clinicians in the assessment of pediatric head injury population, but judicious use is required given radiation exposure, malignancy risk, and resource constraints. Guidelines and head injury rules have been developed, for adults and children, to support decision-making in the emergency department though whether their use is applicable to all population groups is debatable. Further challenges in mild pediatric head trauma also include appropriate recommendations for school attendance and physical activity after discharge. Concern remains for second-impact syndrome and, in the longer term, for post-concussive syndrome and further research in both is still needed. Furthermore, the development of clinical decision rules raises further questions on the purpose of admitting children with minor head injuries and answering this question may aid the evolution of clinical decision guidelines. The next generation of catheter with homogeneous flow patterns based on parametric designs may represent a step forward for the treatment of hydrocephalus, by possibly broadening their lifespan.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Other 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 20 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 23%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 25 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,525,274
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Child's Nervous System
#1,820
of 2,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,823
of 315,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child's Nervous System
#68
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,818 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.