↓ Skip to main content

Artificial intelligence outperforms experienced nephrologists to assess dry weight in pediatric patients on chronic hemodialysis

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Artificial intelligence outperforms experienced nephrologists to assess dry weight in pediatric patients on chronic hemodialysis
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00467-018-4015-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olivier Niel, Paul Bastard, Charlotte Boussard, Julien Hogan, Thérésa Kwon, Georges Deschênes

Abstract

Dry weight is the lowest weight patients on hemodialysis can tolerate; correct dry weight estimation is necessary to minimize morbi-mortality, but is difficult to achieve. Here, we used artificial intelligence to improve the accuracy of dry weight assessment in hemodialysis patients. We designed a neural network which used bio-impedancemetry, blood volume monitoring, and blood pressure values as inputs; output was artificial intelligence dry weight. Fourteen pediatric patients were switched from nephrologist to artificial intelligence dry weight. Artificial intelligence dry weight was higher (28.6%), lower (50%), or identical to nephrologist dry weight. Mean difference between artificial intelligence and nephrologist dry weights was 0.497 kg (- 1.33 to + 1.29 kg). In patients for whom artificial intelligence dry weight was lower than nephrologist dry weight, systolic blood pressure significantly decreased after dry weight decrease to artificial intelligence dry weight (77th to 60th percentile, p = 0.022); anti-hypertensive treatments were successfully decreased or discontinued in 28.7% of cases. In patients for whom artificial intelligence dry weight was higher than nephrologist dry weight, no hypertension was observed after dry weight increase to artificial intelligence dry weight; when present, symptoms of dry weight underestimation receded. Neural network predictions outperformed those of experienced nephrologists in most cases, proving artificial intelligence is a powerful tool for predicting dry weight in hemodialysis patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Other 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Computer Science 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 19 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,850,549
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#819
of 4,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,929
of 340,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#23
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.