↓ Skip to main content

Red Cell Transfusion Triggers and Postoperative Outcomes After Major Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Red Cell Transfusion Triggers and Postoperative Outcomes After Major Surgery
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11605-015-2926-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuhree Kim, Gaya Spolverato, Donald J Lucas, Aslam Ejaz, Li Xu, Doris Wagner, Steven M Frank, Timothy M Pawlik

Abstract

The effect of packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion on postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing major surgery remains unclear. We sought to determine the impact of blood utilization, as well as transfusion practices, on perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing cardiothoracic-vascular (CT-V) and gastrointestinal (GI) procedures. Patients who underwent major surgical procedures at Johns Hopkins Hospital between 2009 and 2014 were identified. Data on perioperative hemoglobin (Hb) and blood utilization were obtained; transfusion strategy was categorized as liberal (Hb trigger ≥7 g/dL) vs. restrictive (Hb trigger <7 g/dL). Risk-adjusted logistic regression models and propensity score matching were used to assess the association between transfusion triggers and perioperative morbidity. Among 10,163 patients undergoing either CT-V (50.9 %) or GI (49.1 %) surgery, 4401 (43.3 %) patients received PRBCs. Of the 4401 patients transfused, 71.2 % were transfused using a liberal trigger (≥7 g/dL hemoglobin), while 28.8 % had a restrictive trigger (<7 g/dL). The median number of PRBCs transfused was 3 (restrictive 5 vs. liberal 2 units). While ischemic adverse events were more common among patients undergoing CT-V surgery (17.3 %), infection was the more common complication among patients undergoing GI surgery (11.9 %). American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class 3-4, Charlson score ≥3, and total units of transfused PRBCs were independently associated with overall complications (all P < 0.05). Patients in the restrictive transfusion group did not have increased risk of complications compared with the liberal transfusion group on multivariable analysis (odds ratio (OR) 1.16, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.98-1.38; P = 0.08) or after propensity score matching (OR 1.04, 95 % CI 0.88-1.22; P = 0.65). Liberal transfusion triggers after major surgery were more common than restrictive practice. Patients with restrictive transfusion trigger did not have increased risk for complications compared with patients transfused with a liberal trigger.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Unspecified 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Unspecified 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2015.
All research outputs
#14,600,874
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#1,228
of 2,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,655
of 279,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#10
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,485 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.