↓ Skip to main content

Gut colonization with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and risk for subsequent enteric infection

Overview of attention for article published in Gut Pathogens, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Gut colonization with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and risk for subsequent enteric infection
Published in
Gut Pathogens, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13099-018-0259-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordan E. Axelrad, Benjamin Lebwohl, Edward Cuaresma, Ken Cadwell, Peter H. R. Green, Daniel E. Freedberg

Abstract

Gut colonization with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) is associated with poor outcomes. This study evaluated the impact of VRE colonization on subsequent acquisition of enteric pathogens. We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults admitted to an ICU from 2012 to 2017 who were screened for VRE colonization and subsequently underwent stool testing with a gastrointestinal pathogen PCR panel (GI PCR) with or without PCR testing for Clostridium difficile. Our primary outcome was the presence of any enteric pathogen. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to adjust for factors associated with enteric infection. Of 761 patients who underwent VRE screening and subsequent GI PCR, 131 (17%) were colonized with VRE. Patients with VRE colonization were less likely to test positive on GI PCR compared to patients without VRE (9.2% vs 18%, p = 0.01); specifically for E. coli species (p = 0.03) and viral (p = 0.04) enteric infections. In 716 patients who underwent C. difficile testing, there was a trend towards more C. difficile infections in patients colonized with VRE (15% vs 10%, p = 0.11). On multivariable analysis, patients with VRE had a decreased risk of a positive GI PCR (aHR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.88, p = 0.02) but not C. difficile infection, effects which persisted during 5 years of follow-up. Among positive tests, there was a greater proportion of C. difficile with VRE (57% vs 28%, p < 0.01). VRE colonization was associated with a decreased risk of subsequent non-C. difficile enteric infection. VRE domination of the gut microbiome may protect against acquisition of common enteric pathogens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 6 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 11 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,514,969
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Gut Pathogens
#154
of 526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,981
of 326,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut Pathogens
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.