↓ Skip to main content

The Gluten-Free/Casein-Free Diet: A Double-Blind Challenge Trial in Children with Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
71 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
Title
The Gluten-Free/Casein-Free Diet: A Double-Blind Challenge Trial in Children with Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10803-015-2564-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan L. Hyman, Patricia A. Stewart, Jennifer Foley, Usa Cain, Robin Peck, Danielle D. Morris, Hongyue Wang, Tristram Smith

Abstract

To obtain information on the safety and efficacy of the gluten-free/casein-free (GFCF) diet, we placed 14 children with autism, age 3-5 years, on the diet for 4-6 weeks and then conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled challenge study for 12 weeks while continuing the diet, with a 12-week follow-up. Dietary challenges were delivered via weekly snacks that contained gluten, casein, gluten and casein, or placebo. With nutritional counseling, the diet was safe and well-tolerated. However, dietary challenges did not have statistically significant effects on measures of physiologic functioning, behavior problems, or autism symptoms. Although these findings must be interpreted with caution because of the small sample size, the study does not provide evidence to support general use of the GFCF diet.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 301 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 65 21%
Student > Master 40 13%
Researcher 26 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 52 17%
Unknown 83 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 50 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 14%
Psychology 29 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 8%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Other 47 15%
Unknown 97 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 171. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#240,308
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#52
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,893
of 278,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.