↓ Skip to main content

Physicochemical Properties of Biochars Produced from Biosolids in Victoria, Australia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physicochemical Properties of Biochars Produced from Biosolids in Victoria, Australia
Published in
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, July 2018
DOI 10.3390/ijerph15071459
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yumeng Yang, Barry Meehan, Kalpit Shah, Aravind Surapaneni, Jeff Hughes, Leon Fouché, Jorge Paz-Ferreiro

Abstract

Some of the barriers associated with the land application of biosolids generated in wastewater treatment plants can be eliminated simply by converting the biosolids into biochar using a thermal conversion process called “pyrolysis”. In the current work, eight biosolids from four different wastewater treatment plants in southeast Melbourne, Victoria, Australia were collected and pyrolysed to produce biochars at two different temperatures (500 and 700 °C). In addition, characterisation studies were carried out on the biochars to obtain their physicochemical properties, which were subsequently compared with the properties of the parent biosolids. The major findings of the work demonstrated that biochars exhibited large decreases in DTPA-extractable metals such as Cd, Cu, and Zn, and also led to favorable changes in several chemical and physical characteristics (i.e., pH, Olsen P, electrical conductivity, and surface area) for agricultural land application compared to their original form (i.e., biosolids). Overall, the study suggests that there is great potential for converting biosolids to biochar using pyrolysis. This may not only improve the properties of biosolids for land application, but also has potential to reduce the risk to receiving environments and, furthermore, eliminate many of the costly elements associated with biosolids stockpiling and management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Master 10 12%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 30 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 14%
Chemistry 7 9%
Chemical Engineering 5 6%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 33 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#24,709
of 31,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,048
of 339,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#363
of 447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.