↓ Skip to main content

Surviving the Distance: The Transnational Utilization of Traditional Medicine Among Oaxacan Migrants in the US

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Surviving the Distance: The Transnational Utilization of Traditional Medicine Among Oaxacan Migrants in the US
Published in
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10903-015-0245-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tonatiuh González-Vázquez, Blanca Estela Pelcastre-Villafuerte, Arianna Taboada

Abstract

Transnational health practices are an emergent and understudied phenomenon, which provide insight into how migrants seek care and tend to their health care needs in receiving communities. We conducted in depth interviews with return migrants (N = 21) and traditional healers (N = 11) to explore transnational health practices among Mixtec migrants from Oaxaca, specifically in relation to their utilization of traditional healers, medicinal plants, and folk remedies. In established migrant destination points, folk remedies and plants are readily available, and furthermore, these resources often travel alongside migrants. Traditional healers are integral to transnational networks, whether they migrate and provide services in the destination point, or are providing services from communities of origin. Findings encourage us to rethink migrants' communities of origin typically thought of as "left behind," and instead reposition them as inherently connected by transnational channels. Implications for transnational health care theory and practice are addressed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 16%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 13 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 15 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,577,479
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#649
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,952
of 336,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#19
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.