| Title |
Changes in the Covalence Ethical Quote, Financial Performance and Financial Reporting Quality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-014-2437-8 |
| Authors |
Fayez A. Elayan, Jingyu Li, Zhefeng Frank Liu, Thomas O. Meyer, Sandra Felton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 18% |
| Lecturer | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 21% |
| Unknown | 36 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 52 | 40% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 21 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 42 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,466,608
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,180
of 2,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,479
of 260,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#18
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.