Title |
Cyclooxygenase- and lipoxygenase-mediated DNA damage
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10555-011-9298-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
N. Speed, I. A. Blair |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 20% |
Researcher | 7 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 29% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 14 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,466,608
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#286
of 808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,639
of 139,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.