↓ Skip to main content

The knowledge value-chain of genetic counseling for breast cancer: an empirical assessment of prediction and communication processes

Overview of attention for article published in Familial Cancer, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
The knowledge value-chain of genetic counseling for breast cancer: an empirical assessment of prediction and communication processes
Published in
Familial Cancer, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10689-015-9835-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nabil Amara, Jolyane Blouin-Bougie, Jalila Jbilou, Norrin Halilem, Jacques Simard, Réjean Landry

Abstract

The aim of this paper is twofold: to analyze the genetic counseling process for breast cancer with a theoretical knowledge transfer lens and to compare generalists, medical specialists, and genetic counselors with regards to their genetic counseling practices. This paper presents the genetic counseling process occurring within a chain of value-adding activities of four main stages describing health professionals' clinical practices: (1) evaluation, (2) investigation, (3) information, and (4) decision. It also presents the results of a cross-sectional study based on a Canadian medical doctors and genetic counselors survey (n = 176) realized between July 2012 and March 2013. The statistical exercise included descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA and post-hoc tests. The results indicate that even though all types of health professionals are involved in the entire process of genetic counseling for breast cancer, genetic counselors are more involved in the evaluation of breast cancer risk, while medical doctors are more active in the decision toward breast cancer risk management strategies. The results secondly demonstrate the relevance and the key role of genetic counselors in the care provided to women at-risk of familial breast cancer. This paper presents an integrative framework to understand the current process of genetic counseling for breast cancer in Canada, and to shed light on how and where health professionals contribute to the process. It also offers a starting point for assessing clinical practices in genetic counseling in order to establish more clearly where and to what extent efforts should be undertaken to implement future genetic services.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Unspecified 5 6%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 22 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 8%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Unspecified 5 6%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 25 32%