↓ Skip to main content

Children with Autism Fail to Orient to Naturally Occurring Social Stimuli

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
852 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
626 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Children with Autism Fail to Orient to Naturally Occurring Social Stimuli
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1026043926488
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geraldine Dawson, Andrew N. Meltzoff, Julie Osterling, Julie Rinaldi, Emily Brown

Abstract

Children with autism were compared to developmentally matched children with Down syndrome or typical development in terms of their ability to visually orient to two social stimuli (name called, hands clapping) and two nonsocial stimuli (rattle, musical jack-in-the-box), and in terms of their ability to share attention (following another's gaze or point). It was found that, compared to children with Down syndrome or typical development, children with autism more frequently failed to orient to all stimuli, and that this failure was much more extreme for social stimuli. Children with autism who oriented to social stimuli took longer to do so compared to the other two groups of children. Children with autism also exhibited impairments in shared attention. Moreover, for both children with autism and Down syndrome, correlational analyses revealed a relation between shared attention performance and the ability to orient to social stimuli, but no relation between shared attention performance and the ability to orient to nonsocial stimuli. Results suggest that social orienting impairments may contribute to difficulties in shared attention found in autism.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 626 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 1%
United Kingdom 8 1%
Canada 6 <1%
France 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 599 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 151 24%
Student > Master 103 16%
Researcher 74 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 54 9%
Student > Bachelor 49 8%
Other 98 16%
Unknown 97 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 315 50%
Social Sciences 35 6%
Neuroscience 34 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 4%
Other 67 11%
Unknown 120 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,369,982
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,754
of 5,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,721
of 109,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them