↓ Skip to main content

Coping with chemotherapy for breast cancer: Asking women what works

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Oncology Nursing, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coping with chemotherapy for breast cancer: Asking women what works
Published in
European Journal of Oncology Nursing, June 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.06.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Gibbons, AnnMarie Groarke

Abstract

To explore the coping strategies women use to cope with the side effects and distress of chemotherapy for breast cancer. Twenty women with breast cancer who received chemotherapy took part in qualitative, semi-structured face-to-face interviews about their coping strategies. Ten women had received their diagnosis via a national breast cancer screening programme, and ten women had been diagnosed through referral to a symptomatic breast cancer services clinic. Data was analysed using thematic analysis based on an interpretative phenomenological approach. A combination of coping strategies were utilised to deal with the side effects of chemotherapy, with three main themes emerging. Behavioural coping strategies such as anticipatory coping and maintenance of activities were used to regain a sense of control. Emotional coping strategies such as seeking support and reappraisal were utilised to cope with treatment-related distress. Women also engaged in coping appraisal, whereby women evaluated how effective their responses were in reducing their distress, often leading to a change in the coping strategies used. Women who were diagnosed through the screening programme were less likely to seek treatment information or access cancer support services. Anticipating side effects and engaging in coping strategies to minimise their impact highlights the importance of providing accurate information about the side effects of treatment, and the potential for these strategies as components of effective interventions to reduce distress. Oncology nurses are ideally placed to drive provision of pre-chemotherapy care programmes that include specific preparatory information to increase adaptive coping, and reduce distress.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 6 7%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 30 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 23 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Psychology 6 7%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 36 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,518,560
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Oncology Nursing
#454
of 833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,605
of 342,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Oncology Nursing
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 833 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.