↓ Skip to main content

Cancer survivorship services for indigenous peoples: where we stand, where to improve? A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Survivorship, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Cancer survivorship services for indigenous peoples: where we stand, where to improve? A systematic review
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11764-015-0479-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bridget M. Cavanagh, Claire E. Wakefield, Jordana K. McLoone, Gail Garvey, Richard J. Cohn

Abstract

There are few support programs with evidence-based practices which address the needs of cancer survivors from indigenous populations. This systematic review analysed the experiences and current support services for cancer survivors from indigenous populations following the cessation of cancer treatment. The data sourced for this article was identified from a systematic search of five databases (MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, PyscINFO, CINAHL, and EMBASE). Studies were selected if they described the experiences of indigenous cancer survivors, their families, and/or clinicians primarily responsible for their care. In total 208 unique abstracts were screened, from which 17 studies were identified as having fulfilled all selection criteria. Of the 17 articles reviewed, 12 described qualitative data and 5 provided quantitative data. Common themes identified included the importance of family support throughout the survivorship period, the negative effect of community stigmatization, fatalistic attitudes towards cancer, and the importance of spirituality in coping with, and understanding, the cancer experience. Potential barriers to accessing care included distance and difficulties revisiting the survivor's cancer experience due to an associated fear of cancer recurrence. Indigenous cancer survivors would benefit from survivorship programs more specifically tailored to their individual circumstances, such as personalized spiritual care, facilitation of increased involvement of family members, and connection to other indigenous cancer survivors. The results from this review indicate that there is a need for survivorship care to be shaped specifically for the needs of indigenous cancer survivors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Researcher 4 5%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 27 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Psychology 8 11%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 29 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2015.
All research outputs
#6,955,306
of 24,849,927 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#502
of 1,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,436
of 273,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,849,927 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.