↓ Skip to main content

Using Implicit Instructional Cues to Influence False Memory Induction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Using Implicit Instructional Cues to Influence False Memory Induction
Published in
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10936-014-9301-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura K. Cirelli, Joël Dickinson, Marie Poirier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 26%
Social Sciences 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Linguistics 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2016.
All research outputs
#17,772,019
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
#258
of 354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,782
of 227,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.