↓ Skip to main content

The importance of dialogic processes to conceptual development in mathematics

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Studies in Mathematics, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
The importance of dialogic processes to conceptual development in mathematics
Published in
Educational Studies in Mathematics, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10649-015-9618-y
Authors

Sibel Kazak, Rupert Wegerif, Taro Fujita

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 141 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 11%
Researcher 13 9%
Lecturer 8 6%
Other 31 22%
Unknown 41 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 36 25%
Mathematics 32 23%
Psychology 9 6%
Arts and Humanities 7 5%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 47 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2015.
All research outputs
#12,935,224
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#384
of 807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,712
of 262,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 807 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.