You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of gastro-oesophageal reflux interventions for chronic cough associated with gastro-oesophageal reflux
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, December 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.38677.559005.55 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A B Chang, T J Lasserson, T O Kiljander, F L Connor, J T Gaffney, L A Garske |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 80 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 11% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 28% |
| Unknown | 15 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 55% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,622,206
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#26,273
of 64,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,722
of 161,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#70
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.