| Title |
Cardiac Coherence Training to Reduce Anxiety in Remitted Schizophrenia, a Pilot Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10484-015-9312-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Trousselard, F. Canini, D. Claverie, C. Cungi, B. Putois, N. Franck |
| Abstract |
Health care that addresses the emotional regulation capacity of patients with schizophrenia confronted with daily stress may contribute to a less anxious life. A psycho-physiological training [cardiac coherence training (CCT)] focusing on emotion regulation is known to decrease anxiety for healthy individuals. We performed a pilot cross sectional survey to explore the benefits of CCT for clinically stable patients with schizophrenia. Ten patients were enrolled in the program consisting of twelve weekly 1-h session programs monitored over a 2-month period. Standardised questionnaires were used before and after the intervention to assess anxiety, well-being outcomes, and how patients deal with stress and stressors. Results showed that this quite-well accepted intervention improved (or tended to improve) well-being outcomes, state-anxiety, and emotional stressors evaluation. The successful transformations were higher for patients with the highest clinical and emotional suffering. Thus, this pilot study revealed that CCT may help patients with schizophrenia to deal with anxiety in daily life. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 37 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 49 | 40% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 38 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,186,421
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#94
of 461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,128
of 279,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.