↓ Skip to main content

Use of vascular closure device is safe and effective in electrophysiological procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Use of vascular closure device is safe and effective in electrophysiological procedures
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10840-015-0005-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilir Maraj, Adam S. Budzikowski, Waleed Ali, Crisitina A. Mitre, John Kassotis

Abstract

Little is known about the usefulness and safety of vascular closure devices (VCDs) in electrophysiological procedures. We present a retrospective analysis of our experience assessing the utility and outcomes of collagen vascular closure device (Angioseal) in patients that required periprocedural anticoagulation and multiple vascular access sites. An retrospective chart review of patients who have undergone the deployment of VCD following electrophysiological procedures. In 26 patients (16 males, age 57 ± 15 years, weight 96 ± 21 kg), a total of 76 VCD were deployed. Seventy-three VCDs in femoral veins (right or left) and three in femoral artery. The mean number of VCD per patient was 3 (range, 2-4). VCD was successfully deployed in 75 out of 76 access sites. One patient was noted to have ecchymosis in both groins during follow-up visit. No other complications were noted. We provide evidence that a collagen plug-based VCD designed for arterial closure can be safely and effectively used to close multiple venous accesses even in the same vein. This can be accomplished with a venotomy size up to 2 Fr larger than the size of the closure device.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 36%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 14%
Lecturer 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%