↓ Skip to main content

Simulation of Non-Homogeneous CO2 and Its Impact on Regional Temperature in East Asia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Meteorological Research, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Simulation of Non-Homogeneous CO2 and Its Impact on Regional Temperature in East Asia
Published in
Journal of Meteorological Research, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13351-018-7159-x
Authors

Xiaodong Xie, Xiaoxian Huang, Tijian Wang, Mengmeng Li, Shu Li, Pulong Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 33%
Materials Science 1 33%
Chemistry 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2019.
All research outputs
#14,419,368
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Meteorological Research
#23
of 35 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,421
of 326,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Meteorological Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.