| Title |
Acute Toxicity Assessment of Reactive Red 120 to Certain Aquatic Organisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00128-015-1636-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Darsana, G. Chandrasehar, V. Deepa, Y. Gowthami, T. Chitrikha, S. Ayyappan, A. Goparaju |
| Abstract |
Laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate the acute toxicity of a widely used textile dye namely Reactive Red 120 (RR 120) on certain aquatic species such as Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (green alga), Lemna gibba (duck weed), Daphnia magna (water flea) and Oncorhynchus mykiss (Rainbow trout). All experiments were performed as per the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals. The toxicity end points of EC50, LC50, NOEC and LOEC for RR 120 were determined with 95 % confidence limits using TOX STAT version 3.5. The EC50 of RR 120 for green alga, duck weed and water flea are >100.00, 64.34, 10.40 mg L(-1), respectively and LC50 for Rainbow trout is 78.84 mg L(-1). Based on the results, the test item RR 120 could be classified as non-toxic to green alga, harmful to duck weed and Rainbow trout, toxic to water flea. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 11% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2015.
All research outputs
#18,922,529
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#2,738
of 4,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,716
of 271,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#20
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.