Using Commercial Physical Activity Trackers for Health Promotion Research: Four Case Studies

Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy, Danielle E. Jake-Schoffman, Camelia Singletary, Marquivieus Wright, Anthony Crimarco, Michael D. Wirth, Nitin Shivappa, Trisha Mandes, Delia Smith West, Sara Wilcox, Clemens Drenowatz, Andrew Hester, Matthew J. McGrievy

Wearable physical activity (PA) trackers are becoming increasingly popular for intervention and assessment in health promotion research and practice. The purpose of this article is to present lessons learned from four studies that used commercial PA tracking devices for PA intervention or assessment, present issues encountered with their use, and provide guidelines for determining which tools to use. Four case studies are presented that used PA tracking devices (iBitz, Zamzee, FitBit Flex and Zip, Omron Digital Pedometer, Sensewear Armband, and MisFit Flash) in the field-two used the tools for intervention and two used the tools as assessment methods. The four studies presented had varying levels of success with using PA devices and experienced several issues that impacted their studies, such as companies that went out of business, missing data, and lost devices. Percentage ranges for devices that were lost were 0% to 29% and was 0% to 87% for those devices that malfunctioned or lost data. There is a need for low-cost, easy-to-use, accurate PA tracking devices to use as both intervention and assessment tools in health promotion research related to PA.