You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accuracy or precision: Implications of sample design and methodology on abundance estimation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Modelling, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.08.016 |
| Authors |
Lucas K. Kowalewski, Christopher J. Chizinski, Larkin A. Powell, Kevin L. Pope, Mark A. Pegg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 24% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2015.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Modelling
#1,652
of 2,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,399
of 294,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Modelling
#23
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,342 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.