↓ Skip to main content

Advanced neuroimaging applied to veterans and service personnel with traumatic brain injury: state of the art and potential benefits

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Advanced neuroimaging applied to veterans and service personnel with traumatic brain injury: state of the art and potential benefits
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11682-015-9444-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisabeth A. Wilde, Sylvain Bouix, David F. Tate, Alexander P. Lin, Mary R. Newsome, Brian A. Taylor, James R. Stone, James Montier, Samuel E. Gandy, Brian Biekman, Martha E. Shenton, Gerald York

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains one of the most prevalent forms of morbidity among Veterans and Service Members, particularly for those engaged in the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Neuroimaging has been considered a potentially useful diagnostic and prognostic tool across the spectrum of TBI generally, but may have particular importance in military populations where the diagnosis of mild TBI is particularly challenging, given the frequent lack of documentation on the nature of the injuries and mixed etiologies, and highly comorbid with other disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and substance misuse. Imaging has also been employed in attempts to understand better the potential late effects of trauma and to evaluate the effects of promising therapeutic interventions. This review surveys the use of structural and functional neuroimaging techniques utilized in military studies published to date, including the utilization of quantitative fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), volumetric analysis, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), magnetization transfer imaging (MTI), positron emission tomography (PET), magnetoencephalography (MEG), task-based and resting state functional MRI (fMRI), arterial spin labeling (ASL), and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). The importance of quality assurance testing in current and future research is also highlighted. Current challenges and limitations of each technique are outlined, and future directions are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 172 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 39 22%
Unknown 42 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 16%
Psychology 25 14%
Neuroscience 21 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Engineering 8 5%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 58 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2020.
All research outputs
#5,545,213
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#313
of 1,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,945
of 267,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.