You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Santa Barbara and Foothill Groundwater Basins Geohydrology and Optimal Water Resources Management—Developed using Density Dependent Solute Transport and Optimization Models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
US Geological Survey, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3133/sir20185059 |
| Authors |
Paulinski, Scott, Stanko, Zachary, Cromwell, Geoffrey, Boyce, Scott E., Paulinski, Scott R., Nishikawa, Tracy, Stanko, Zachary P. |
| Editors |
Nishikawa, Tracy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 44% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Researcher | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 3 | 33% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,836,254
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#545
of 2,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,579
of 442,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#78
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.