| Title |
Long-term effects of fire and harvest on carbon stocks of boreal forests in northeastern China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Forest Science , July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13595-018-0722-x |
| Authors |
Chao Huang, Hong S. He, Yu Liang, Zhiwei Wu, Todd J. Hawbaker, Peng Gong, Zhiliang Zhu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 8 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,848,115
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#104
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,992
of 341,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.