↓ Skip to main content

Congenital hydrocephalus: Nosology and guidelines for clinical approach and genetic counselling

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, May 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Congenital hydrocephalus: Nosology and guidelines for clinical approach and genetic counselling
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, May 1998
DOI 10.1007/s004310050830
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Schrander-Stumpel, J. -P. Fryns

Abstract

Congenital hydrocephalus is a serious condition that can arise from multiple causes. It comprises a diverse group of conditions which result in impaired circulation and absorption of cerebrospinal fluid. Congenital malformations of the central nervous system, infections, haemorrhage, trauma, teratogens and, occasionally, tumours can all give rise to hydrocephalus. In this paper we focus on the genetic aspects of hydrocephalus, excluding neural tube defects. The incidence is 0.4-0.8 per 1000 liveborns and stillbirths. X-linked hydrocephalus comprises approximately 5% of all cases. This condition is caused by mutations in the gene at Xq28 encoding for L1, a neural cell adhesion molecule. Carrier detection and prenatal diagnosis can be offered to affected families by means of chorionic villus biopsy and linkage analysis or L1 mutation analysis. In general, recurrence risk for congenital hydrocephalus excluding X-linked hydrocephalus, is low; empiric risk figures found in various studies range from <1% to 4%. Unfortunately, prenatal diagnosis based on an early ultrasound scan is not always reliable as ventriculomegaly usually starts after 20 weeks of gestation. We stress the importance of additional clinical investigations. Prognosis in the prenatally diagnosed patients depends on additional malformations but in general, is not very good. Congenital hydrocephalus may be non-syndromic and syndromic. Prognosis depends primarily on the underlying cause and/or associated malformations, which have to be delineated on the basis of clinical, cytogenetic and molecular analysis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 94 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 11 11%
Other 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 43%
Neuroscience 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Engineering 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 29 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,466,608
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,459
of 3,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,400
of 34,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.