↓ Skip to main content

Seasonal controls on ecosystem-scale CO2 and energy exchange in a Sonoran Desert characterized by the saguaro cactus (Carnegiea gigantea)

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Seasonal controls on ecosystem-scale CO2 and energy exchange in a Sonoran Desert characterized by the saguaro cactus (Carnegiea gigantea)
Published in
Oecologia, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00442-018-4187-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lawrence B. Flanagan, June E. M. Flanagan

Abstract

Episodic precipitation pulses are important for driving biological activity in desert ecosystems. The pattern of precipitation, including the size of rain events and the duration of time between events, can influence ecosystem net CO2 exchange (NEE) by shifting the balance between ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration. Our objective was to measure the response of NEE and its major components, to seasonal variation in precipitation and other environmental conditions. The study was conducted at a site, where 40-60% of annual precipitation comes from the North American Monsoon that typically brings rain in July-September, a time period when temperatures are near the seasonal peak. The results were compared to a model of the expected responses of NEE to seasonal changes in precipitation and temperature. We measured NEE using the eddy covariance technique during September 2015-August 2016. The ecosystem showed large (fivefold) seasonal variation in maximum photosynthesis and ecosystem respiration rate at 10 °C that corresponded to seasonal variation in precipitation and temperature. Ecosystem respiratory activity exceeded photosynthetic activity, so the ecosystem was a net source of CO2 to the atmosphere during June-October, a period that included monsoon rain inputs. Only during the winter months (November-March) did photosynthesis exceed respiration, resulting in net ecosystem carbon sequestration. The ecosystem recorded a net loss of 10 g C m-2 year-1, which was likely caused by below normal annual precipitation during the study. Our results illustrated the important interaction between seasonal variation in precipitation and temperature in controlling the ecosystem carbon budget.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 38%
Environmental Science 4 31%
Decision Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2018.
All research outputs
#17,961,306
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,578
of 4,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,790
of 329,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#60
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.