↓ Skip to main content

Degradation of plastics and plastic-degrading bacteria in cold marine habitats

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
360 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1379 Mendeley
Title
Degradation of plastics and plastic-degrading bacteria in cold marine habitats
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00253-018-9195-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aneta K. Urbanek, Waldemar Rymowicz, Aleksandra M. Mirończuk

Abstract

Synthetic plastics present in everyday materials constitute the main anthropogenic debris entering the Earth's oceans. The oceans provide important and valuable resources such as food, energy, and water. They are also the main way of international trade and the main stabilizer of the climate. Hence, changes in the marine ecosystem caused by anthropogenic influences such as plastic pollution can have a dramatic impact on a global scale. Although the problem of plastics still remains unsolved, different ways are being considered to reduce their impact on the environment. One of them is to use microorganisms capable of degradation of plastic. A particularly interesting area is the application of microorganisms isolated from cold regions in view of their unique characteristics. Nevertheless, the interactions between plastic and microorganisms are still poorly known. Here, we present a review of current knowledge on plastic degradation and plastic-microorganism interactions in cold marine habitats. Moreover, we highlight the advantages of microorganisms isolated from this environment for eliminating plastic waste from ecosystems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1379 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 234 17%
Student > Master 178 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 135 10%
Researcher 120 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 51 4%
Other 166 12%
Unknown 495 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 203 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 149 11%
Environmental Science 137 10%
Engineering 76 6%
Chemistry 71 5%
Other 207 15%
Unknown 536 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,155,928
of 24,727,020 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#53
of 8,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,832
of 331,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#3
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,727,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.