↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and management of Cornelia de Lange syndrome: first international consensus statement

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Genetics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
250 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnosis and management of Cornelia de Lange syndrome: first international consensus statement
Published in
Nature Reviews Genetics, July 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41576-018-0031-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonie D. Kline, Joanna F. Moss, Angelo Selicorni, Anne-Marie Bisgaard, Matthew A. Deardorff, Peter M. Gillett, Stacey L. Ishman, Lynne M. Kerr, Alex V. Levin, Paul A. Mulder, Feliciano J. Ramos, Jolanta Wierzba, Paola Francesca Ajmone, David Axtell, Natalie Blagowidow, Anna Cereda, Antonella Costantino, Valerie Cormier-Daire, David FitzPatrick, Marco Grados, Laura Groves, Whitney Guthrie, Sylvia Huisman, Frank J. Kaiser, Gerritjan Koekkoek, Mary Levis, Milena Mariani, Joseph P. McCleery, Leonie A. Menke, Amy Metrena, Julia O’Connor, Chris Oliver, Juan Pie, Sigrid Piening, Carol J. Potter, Ana L. Quaglio, Egbert Redeker, David Richman, Claudia Rigamonti, Angell Shi, Zeynep Tümer, Ingrid D. C. Van Balkom, Raoul C. Hennekam

Abstract

Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS) is an archetypical genetic syndrome that is characterized by intellectual disability, well-defined facial features, upper limb anomalies and atypical growth, among numerous other signs and symptoms. It is caused by variants in any one of seven genes, all of which have a structural or regulatory function in the cohesin complex. Although recent advances in next-generation sequencing have improved molecular diagnostics, marked heterogeneity exists in clinical and molecular diagnostic approaches and care practices worldwide. Here, we outline a series of recommendations that document the consensus of a group of international experts on clinical diagnostic criteria, both for classic CdLS and non-classic CdLS phenotypes, molecular investigations, long-term management and care planning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 358 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 51 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 10%
Other 33 9%
Researcher 30 8%
Student > Master 29 8%
Other 56 16%
Unknown 122 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 5%
Psychology 12 3%
Other 45 13%
Unknown 122 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,589,298
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Genetics
#1,066
of 2,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,474
of 340,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Genetics
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.