↓ Skip to main content

Incremental willingness to pay: a theoretical and empirical exposition

Overview of attention for article published in Theory and Decision, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Incremental willingness to pay: a theoretical and empirical exposition
Published in
Theory and Decision, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11238-014-9480-x
Authors

Karine Lamiraud, Robert Oxoby, Cam Donaldson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Lecturer 1 4%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2015.
All research outputs
#19,335,623
of 23,935,525 outputs
Outputs from Theory and Decision
#220
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,827
of 270,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory and Decision
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,935,525 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.