| Title |
Gene editing the phytoene desaturase alleles of Cavendish banana using CRISPR/Cas9
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Transgenic Research, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11248-018-0083-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fatima Naim, Benjamin Dugdale, Jennifer Kleidon, Anthony Brinin, Kylie Shand, Peter Waterhouse, James Dale |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 19% |
| Canada | 3 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 69% |
| Scientists | 8 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 161 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 20% |
| Researcher | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 51 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 54 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#697,057
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Transgenic Research
#8
of 955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,784
of 343,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transgenic Research
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them