↓ Skip to main content

Big Data, Internet of Things and Cloud Convergence – An Architecture for Secure E-Health Applications

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Systems, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
Title
Big Data, Internet of Things and Cloud Convergence – An Architecture for Secure E-Health Applications
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10916-015-0327-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

George Suciu, Victor Suciu, Alexandru Martian, Razvan Craciunescu, Alexandru Vulpe, Ioana Marcu, Simona Halunga, Octavian Fratu

Abstract

Big data storage and processing are considered as one of the main applications for cloud computing systems. Furthermore, the development of the Internet of Things (IoT) paradigm has advanced the research on Machine to Machine (M2M) communications and enabled novel tele-monitoring architectures for E-Health applications. However, there is a need for converging current decentralized cloud systems, general software for processing big data and IoT systems. The purpose of this paper is to analyze existing components and methods of securely integrating big data processing with cloud M2M systems based on Remote Telemetry Units (RTUs) and to propose a converged E-Health architecture built on Exalead CloudView, a search based application. Finally, we discuss the main findings of the proposed implementation and future directions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 295 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 19%
Student > Master 54 18%
Student > Bachelor 35 12%
Researcher 21 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 52 18%
Unknown 58 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 113 38%
Engineering 43 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 71 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#14,552,069
of 24,814,419 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#554
of 1,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,824
of 273,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#10
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,814,419 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.