| Title |
Die Rolle von Integrating the Healtcare Enterprise (IHE) in der Telemedizin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00103-015-2226-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
B. Bergh, A. Brandner, J. Heiß, U. Kutscha, A. Merzweiler, R. Pahontu, B. Schreiweis, N. Yüksekogul, T. Bronsch, O. Heinze |
| Abstract |
Telemedicine systems are today already used in a variety of areas to improve patient care. The lack of standardization in those solutions creates a lack of interoperability of the systems. Internationally accepted standards can help to solve the lack of system interoperability. With Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE), a worldwide initiative of users and vendors is working on the use of defined standards for specific use cases by describing those use cases in so called IHE Profiles. The aim of this work is to determine how telemedicine applications can be implemented using IHE profiles. Based on a literature review, exemplary telemedicine applications are described and technical abilities of IHE Profiles are evaluated. These IHE Profiles are examined for their usability and are then evaluated in exemplary telemedicine application architectures. There are IHE Profiles which can be identified as being useful for intersectoral patient records (e.g. PEHR at Heidelberg), as well as for point to point communication where no patient record is involved. In the area of patient records, the IHE Profile "Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing (XDS)" is often used. The point to point communication can be supported using the IHE "Cross-Enterprise Document Media Interchange (XDM)". IHE-based telemedicine applications offer caregivers the possibility to be informed about their patients using data from intersectoral patient records, but also there are possible savings by reusing the standardized interfaces in other scenarios. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 21% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2015.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
#932
of 1,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,241
of 278,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
#17
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.