↓ Skip to main content

The impact of PM2.5 on asthma emergency department visits: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
Title
The impact of PM2.5 on asthma emergency department visits: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11356-015-5321-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jingchun Fan, Shulan Li, Chunling Fan, Zhenggang Bai, Kehu Yang

Abstract

Although the relationship between asthma and exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) has been frequently measured, reported conclusions have not been consistent. As emergency department (ED) visits are an effective way to estimate health outcomes for people with asthma and short-term exposure to PM2.5, this review systematically searched five databases without language or geographical restrictions from inception to January 13, 2015 to study the impact of PM2.5 on asthma ED visits. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI). With respect to short-term effects, asthma ED visits increased at higher PM2.5 concentrations (RR 1.5 % per 10 μg/m(3); 95 % CI 1.2-1.7 %), and children were more susceptible (3.6 % per 10 μg/m(3); 95 % CI 1.8, 5.3 %) than adults (1.7, 95 % CI 0.7 %, 2.8 %) to increased PM2.5; the ED visits increased during the warm season by 3.7 % (95 % CI 0.5, 6.9 %) per 10 μg/m(3) increase in PM2.5, which was higher than the corresponding increase during the cold season (2.6, 95 % CI 0.7-4.6 %). This demonstrates that ambient PM2.5 has an adverse impact on asthma ED visits after short-term exposure and that children are a high-risk population when PM2.5 concentrations are high, particularly in warm seasons, during which measures should be taken to prevent PM2.5.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 165 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 19%
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 6 4%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 39 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 31 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 18%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Engineering 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 46 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,239,862
of 24,653,581 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#188
of 10,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,084
of 272,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#5
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,653,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.