| Title |
Plasticity of grooming behavior against entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae in the ant Lasius japonicus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethology, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10164-011-0285-x |
| Authors |
Masaki Okuno, Kazuki Tsuji, Hiroki Sato, Kenji Fujisaki |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 18% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 65% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethology
#212
of 556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,052
of 130,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.