↓ Skip to main content

Punctuated Equilibrium, Moral Panics and the Ethics Review Process

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Academic Ethics, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Punctuated Equilibrium, Moral Panics and the Ethics Review Process
Published in
Journal of Academic Ethics, November 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10805-005-9004-y
Authors

Maureen H. Fitzgerald

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Netherlands 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 33%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Other 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 38%
Psychology 3 13%
Computer Science 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,466,608
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Academic Ethics
#125
of 232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,848
of 146,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Academic Ethics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them