↓ Skip to main content

CSF overdrainage in shunted intracranial arachnoid cysts: a series and review

Overview of attention for article published in Child's Nervous System, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
CSF overdrainage in shunted intracranial arachnoid cysts: a series and review
Published in
Child's Nervous System, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00381-009-0910-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan F. Martínez-Lage, Antonio M. Ruíz-Espejo, María-José Almagro, Raúl Alfaro, Matías Felipe-Murcia, A. López López-Guerrero

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 15%
Other 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 52%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 16 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,466,608
of 22,828,181 outputs
Outputs from Child's Nervous System
#300
of 2,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,781
of 97,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child's Nervous System
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,181 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,751 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.