↓ Skip to main content

Caught off guard: folk knowledge proves deficient when addressing invasive pests in Asian cassava systems

Overview of attention for article published in Environment, Development and Sustainability, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Caught off guard: folk knowledge proves deficient when addressing invasive pests in Asian cassava systems
Published in
Environment, Development and Sustainability, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10668-018-0208-x
Authors

Bhawana Upadhyay, Dharani D. Burra, Than Thi Nguyen, Kris A. G. Wyckhuys

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 33 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 8%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 34 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,012,809
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Environment, Development and Sustainability
#721
of 999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,799
of 328,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment, Development and Sustainability
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.