↓ Skip to main content

SGLT2 Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Outcomes: Current Perspectives and Future Potentials

Overview of attention for article published in Current Diabetes Reports, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
SGLT2 Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Outcomes: Current Perspectives and Future Potentials
Published in
Current Diabetes Reports, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11892-018-1038-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoming Jia, Paras B. Mehta, Yumei Ye, Mahboob Alam, Yochai Birnbaum, Mandeep Bajaj

Abstract

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been shown to exert benefit on cardiac outcomes. In this review, we provide updates on available clinical data, studies on potential mechanisms for the CV effects, as well as discuss potential clinical implications of these new findings. Since the publications of the EMPA-REG and CANVAS trials, large multi-national cohort studies have further shown the cardioprotective effects of SGLT2i. Moreover, new studies examining SGLT2i action on sodium-hydrogen exchanger proteins in both the heart and the kidney, on myocardial energetics and impact on inflammation and atherosclerosis continue to shed light on the multitude of pleotropic effects of these agents. Though more data is needed to substantiate the safety and efficacy, SGLT2i should be considered as a valuable therapy to help reduce CV risk in patients with diabetes. Ultimately, SGLT2i may have utility in preventing progression to diabetes or providing CV protection in patients who do not have diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 15 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2019.
All research outputs
#14,724,101
of 23,576,969 outputs
Outputs from Current Diabetes Reports
#603
of 1,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,849
of 327,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Diabetes Reports
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,576,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.