↓ Skip to main content

Effects of vitamin D supplementation on metabolic and endocrine parameters in PCOS: a randomized-controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
475 Mendeley
Title
Effects of vitamin D supplementation on metabolic and endocrine parameters in PCOS: a randomized-controlled trial
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00394-018-1760-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Trummer, Verena Schwetz, Martina Kollmann, Monika Wölfler, Julia Münzker, Thomas R. Pieber, Stefan Pilz, Annemieke C. Heijboer, Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch, Elisabeth Lerchbaum

Abstract

Vitamin D status may be associated with insulin resistance and other key features of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), but data from preliminary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are conflicting. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of vitamin D supplementation on plasma glucose area under the curve (AUCgluc, primary outcome measure) and on other metabolic and endocrine parameters (secondary outcome measures). This study was a single-center, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial conducted between December 2011 and July 2017 at the Medical University of Graz, Austria. One-hundred and eighty women with PCOS and 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations < 75 nmol/L were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either receive 20,000 IU of cholecalciferol weekly or placebo over 24 weeks. Primary outcome was the between-group difference in AUCgluc at study end while adjusting for baseline values. In total, 123 participants completed the study [age 25.9 ± 4.7 years; BMI 27.5 ± 7.3 kg/m2; baseline 25(OH)D 48.8 ± 16.9 nmol/L, baseline fasting glucose 84 ± 8 mg/dL]. Vitamin D supplementation lead to a significant increase in 25(OH)D [mean treatment effect 33.4 nmol/L; 95% confidence interval (CI) 24.5 to 42.2; p < 0.001] but had no significant effect on AUCgluc (mean treatment effect - 9.19; 95% CI - 21.40 to 3.02; p = 0.139). Regarding secondary outcome measures, we observed a significant decrease in plasma glucose at 60 min during oral glucose tolerance test (mean treatment effect - 10.2 mg/dL; 95% CI - 20.2 to - 0.3; p = 0.045). Vitamin D supplementation had no significant effect on metabolic and endocrine parameters in PCOS with the exception of a reduced plasma glucose during OGTT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 475 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 475 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 61 13%
Student > Master 23 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 3%
Researcher 12 3%
Student > Postgraduate 10 2%
Other 21 4%
Unknown 335 71%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 347 73%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,471,063
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#596
of 2,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,404
of 330,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#23
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.