↓ Skip to main content

Is the prevalence of orthorexia nervosa in an Australian university population 6.5%?

Overview of attention for article published in Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Is the prevalence of orthorexia nervosa in an Australian university population 6.5%?
Published in
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40519-018-0535-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Reynolds

Abstract

To survey Australian adults at a Sydney university about: their tendencies towards the proposed health food eating disorder, orthorexia nervosa (and to estimate the prevalence of this condition), their eating behaviours, and their body image. A pilot, cross-sectional and descriptive online survey was conducted on staff and students at the University of New South Wales, Sydney. The primary outcome was the score on the most commonly used and validated measure of orthorexic behaviours, the ORTO-15. The point prevalence of orthorexia nervosa was estimated using the ORTO-15 cut-off score of < 35. Other outcomes were the Eating Attitudes Test-26 and the Body Shape Questionnaire-34. In the sample of 92 Australian adults recruited at a university, there was a point prevalence rate for orthorexia nervosa of 21% when using the ORTO-15 cut-off value of < 35. If criteria A and B of proposed diagnostic criteria for the condition were also taken into consideration (i.e. someone with orthorexia nervosa would display disordered healthy eating tendencies; as well as were: underweight, or had marked concern with their body shape, or had significant impairment of functioning in work life or social life), the true prevalence rate could be considered to be 6.5%. Using the ORTO-15 tool alone may overestimate the true prevalence of orthorexia nervosa. Further research into the accurate diagnosis and treatment of orthorexia nervosa is needed. Level V, descriptive study.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Master 14 11%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 44 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 13%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Arts and Humanities 5 4%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 51 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2018.
All research outputs
#21,498,958
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity
#882
of 1,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,814
of 332,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity
#27
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.