↓ Skip to main content

Prioritization and functional assessment of noncoding variants associated with complex diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Prioritization and functional assessment of noncoding variants associated with complex diseases
Published in
Genome Medicine, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13073-018-0565-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin Zhou, Fangqing Zhao

Abstract

Unraveling functional noncoding variants associated with complex diseases is still a great challenge. We present a novel algorithm, Prioritization And Functional Assessment (PAFA), that prioritizes and assesses the functionality of genetic variants by introducing population differentiation measures and recalibrating training variants. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate that PAFA exhibits much higher sensitivity and specificity in prioritizing noncoding risk variants than existing methods. PAFA achieves improved performance in distinguishing both common and rare recurrent variants from non-recurrent variants by integrating multiple annotations and metrics. An integrated platform was developed, providing comprehensive functional annotations for noncoding variants by integrating functional genomic data, which can be accessed at http://159.226.67.237:8080/pafa .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 27%
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 21 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,502,969
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#582
of 1,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,492
of 326,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#13
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.