↓ Skip to main content

The impact of “Child Care” intervention in rural Primary Health Care Program on prevalence of diarrhea among children less than 36 months of age in rural western China

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
The impact of “Child Care” intervention in rural Primary Health Care Program on prevalence of diarrhea among children less than 36 months of age in rural western China
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12887-018-1172-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenlong Gao, Guirong Li, Xiaoning Liu, Hong Yan

Abstract

It was unclear how and to what extent the "Child Care" intervention (CCI) in rural Primary Health Care Program affected the prevalence of childhood diarrhea in rural western China. The available data of 10,829 and 10,682 households was collected from shared 34 counties of 9 provinces of western China in 2001 and 2005 respectively. A log-binomial regression model was used to predict the effect of CCI on prevalence of childhood diarrhea. In 2001, the prevalence rate of diarrhea among children less than 36 months of age was 17.01% in intervention group and 17.72% in control group, and in 2005 this crude rate declined to 4.85% in the former and 6.84% in the latter. Log-binomial regression analysis showed that CCI decreased the overall prevalence of childhood diarrhea by 27% (adjusted relative prevalence ratio (rPR) = 0.73 95% CI 0.59, 0.89). The stratification regression by social-economic status (SES) of the households showed that this effect varied with SES of the households. In the medium or rich households, this intervention was effective significantly (the medium: adjusted rPR = 0.63,95%CI 0.41,0.95; the rich: adjusted rPR = 0.72,95%CI 0.54,0.97), but in poor households it seemed to be less effective (adjusted rPR = 0.86,95%CI 0.55,1.36). In rural Primary Health Care Program, CCI was effective in improving childhood diarrhea but this effect was inequitable among SES of the households. So, attention should be paid to the inequality when CCI was adopted to reduce childhood diarrhea in rural China.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Lecturer 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 15 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 16 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2018.
All research outputs
#5,830,887
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#924
of 3,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,390
of 326,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#39
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.