↓ Skip to main content

Relationship between episodic memory and volume of the brain regions of two functional cortical memory systems in multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Relationship between episodic memory and volume of the brain regions of two functional cortical memory systems in multiple sclerosis
Published in
Journal of Neurology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00415-018-8965-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yolanda Aladro, Laudino López-Alvarez, Jorge Mario Sánchez-Reyes, Juan Antonio Hernández-Tamames, Helena Melero, Sandra Rubio-Fernández, Israel Thuissard, Marta Cerezo-García

Abstract

Two functional networks are proposed as neuronal support for the complex processes of memory: the anterior temporal and the medial posterior systems. We examined the atrophy of hippocampus (HC) and of those areas constituting the two functional memory systems in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with low disability. Episodic memory (EM) was assessed in 88 relapsing MS patients and in 40 healthy controls using Wechsler Memory Scale III (Spanish adaptation). FreeSurfer software was used to calculate normalized volume of total cortex, grey matter, white matter, subcortical grey matter (thalamus and striatum), HC and both the anterior temporal (entorhinal, ventral temporopolar, lateral orbitofrontal, amygdala) and posterior medial systems (thalamus, parahippocampal, posterior cingulate, precuneus, lateral parietal and medial prefrontal). Linear regression analysis was used to identify predictors of memory performance. Total grey matter and cortex volumes correlated with all subtypes of EM, and the precuneus volume correlated with overall, immediate and delayed memories. Univariant regression analysis identified an association between the volumes of the posterior medial memory network regions and EM scores. The volume of the left precuneus area was the unique and independent predictor for all EM subtypes except for visual memory, for which left HC volume was also an independent predictor. Left precuneus volume was the best predictor of memory in relapsing MS patients with low disability and mild deficits in EM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 17 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Neuroscience 3 10%
Unknown 19 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,525,274
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#4,035
of 4,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,266
of 326,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#61
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.