↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Positron Emission Tomography, Computed Tomography, and Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Initial Staging of Patients with Esophageal Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Imaging and Biology, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Positron Emission Tomography, Computed Tomography, and Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Initial Staging of Patients with Esophageal Cancer
Published in
Molecular Imaging and Biology, November 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11307-005-0017-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Val J. Lowe, Fargol Booya, J. G. Fletcher, Mark Nathan, Eric Jensen, Brian Mullan, Eric Rohren, Maurits J. Wiersema, Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros, Joseph A. Murray, Mark S. Allen, Michael J. Levy, Jonathan E. Clain

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 14%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Imaging and Biology
#134
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,880
of 76,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Imaging and Biology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them