↓ Skip to main content

Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
313 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00464-009-0822-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kamal Nagpal, Kamran Ahmed, Amit Vats, Danny Yakoub, David James, Hutan Ashrafian, Ara Darzi, Krishna Moorthy, Thanos Athanasiou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 119 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Other 12 9%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Student > Master 12 9%
Other 39 31%
Unknown 24 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 60%
Engineering 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 31 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#4,522,371
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#729
of 6,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,552
of 164,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.