Title |
The importance of CT for the pre-operative surgical planning in recurrent anterior shoulder instability
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00402-012-1656-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Philipp Moroder, Herbert Resch, Silke Schnaitmann, Thomas Hoffelner, Mark Tauber |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
Researcher | 5 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2015.
All research outputs
#4,414,969
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#104
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,964
of 281,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.