↓ Skip to main content

Observer variability of reference tissue selection for relativecerebral blood volume measurements in glioma patients

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Observer variability of reference tissue selection for relativecerebral blood volume measurements in glioma patients
Published in
European Radiology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00330-018-5353-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcel T. H. Oei, Frederick J. A. Meijer, Jan-Jurre Mordang, Ewoud J. Smit, Albert J. S. Idema, Bozena M. Goraj, Hendrik O. A. Laue, Mathias Prokop, Rashindra Manniesing

Abstract

To assess observer variability of different reference tissues used for relative CBV (rCBV) measurements in DSC-MRI of glioma patients. In this retrospective study, three observers measured rCBV in DSC-MR images of 44 glioma patients on two occasions. rCBV is calculated by the CBV in the tumour hotspot/the CBV of a reference tissue at the contralateral side for normalization. One observer annotated the tumour hotspot that was kept constant for all measurements. All observers annotated eight reference tissues of normal white and grey matter. Observer variability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV) and Bland-Altman analyses. For intra-observer, the ICC ranged from 0.50-0.97 (fair-excellent) for all reference tissues. The CV ranged from 5.1-22.1 % for all reference tissues and observers. For inter-observer, the ICC for all pairwise observer combinations ranged from 0.44-0.92 (poor-excellent). The CV ranged from 8.1-31.1 %. Centrum semiovale was the only reference tissue that showed excellent intra- and inter-observer agreement (ICC>0.85) and lowest CVs (<12.5 %). Bland-Altman analyses showed that mean differences for centrum semiovale were close to zero. Selecting contralateral centrum semiovale as reference tissue for rCBV provides the lowest observer variability. • Reference tissue selection for rCBV measurements adds variability to rCBV measurements. • rCBV measurements vary depending on the choice of reference tissue. • Observer variability of reference tissue selection varies between poor and excellent. • Centrum semiovale as reference tissue for rCBV provides the lowest observer variability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 29%
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Physics and Astronomy 3 14%
Computer Science 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,539,088
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#2,490
of 4,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,781
of 331,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#45
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.